For my first summary, I chose an article from CBC entitled "Igor leaves thousands stranded in Newfoundland". The who is the citizens of Newfoundland, the what is the hurricane, the when is Thursday morning, where is Newfoundland, and why may be because the people were ill prepared. The lead was certainly effective because it means thousands of people stranded not too awful far away from here. One quote is from RCMP sgt. Boyd Merrill said, "People do not have to panic; they do not need to rush to the grocery store." Yes, the most interesting information was told first, which was that 1000 people are stranded. The story ends with police telling people things will be back in order soon, but doesn't really have an ending because the hurricane isn't over yet. The article can be found at: http://www.cbc.ca/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2010/09/23/igor-stranded-cleanup-923.html
The second summary is from the Canadian Press article, "Canada fears loss in UN Security Council race against Germany, Portugal". The who is Canada and Germany and Portugal, the what is the countries are fighting over a seat on the UN's most powerful decision making board, the when is as I am writing this, why is because they will have more of a say in world issues, and where is global. The lead is kind of dull or boring because it's nothing of particular value to most people and it doesn't catch my attention. "It's less our style in the economic downturn. At the end of the day, we're not conducting our foreign affairs to be part of a council. We're conducting our foreign affairs based on the values Canadians embrace," said the official. The most important information was told first but I would hardly say that it was at all interesting, but neither was the topic. The ending basically says that whatever the outcome, Canada will survive and still have power among the UN and in foreign affairs. The link is: http://www.thecanadianpress.com/english/online/OnlineFullStory.aspx?filename=DOR-MNN-CP.d30aa1892b194aca8aaaabe33c79394f.CPKEY2008111303&newsitemid=4603693&languageid=1
My third and final summary is called "Iran nuclear program disrupted by cyberattack, experts believe". The who is the Iran idustrial computer system, the what is a virus, the when is this morning, the where is Iran, and the why is suspected to be an attack from within the state. I suppose the lead is effective because it uses the words "nuclear" and "cyberattack" and I don't see how that would not catch anyones attention. “It’s pretty clear that based on the infection behaviour that installations in Iran are being targeted,” said Kevin Hogan, Senior Director of Security Response at Symantec. I think that the most interesting part in this story is told in the title itself, so yes, it was the first part told. The ending is a little boring, with Seimens saying that they will offer up-to-date virus scans and it seems more like an advertisement rather than an ending. This article can be found at: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/africa-mideast/iran-nuclear-program-disrupted-by-cyberattack-experts-believe/article1723083/